× 1-800-946-2642 Home My Account Social / Forum Articles Contact My Cart
Shop Now
Select Your Car Type Sale Items Clearance Items New Items
   Forum Width:     Forum Type: 

 Posted: Jan 8, 2017 03:01PM
 Edited:  Jan 8, 2017 03:32PM
Total posts: 1368
Last post: Jul 20, 2023
Member since:Jul 15, 2008
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 117
WorkBench Posts: 1
US
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1963SV2
…Rosebud is only asking about "how open" due to misunderstanding about how the system works.. 
I think I understand. How open (within reason) is not critical because the valve I'm actually adjusting will remain COMPLETELY closed throughout the open cycle of the valve I'm watching. Correct?  As Alex said "…even a 320° full race cam has the follower [sitting] on the base circle for over half the time." So, I won't be obsessing over a few degrees of cam rotation nor buying a dial gauge any time soon. Thanks everyone! 

 

Michael, Santa Barbara, CA

. . . the sled, not the flower

      Poser MotorSports

 Posted: Jan 8, 2017 01:37PM
Total posts: 1716
Last post: Oct 18, 2020
Member since:Oct 18, 2011
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
"....No argument with comments however Rosebud question still is " how to accurately establish fully open valve" Alex infers close is good enough ( I agree) but dial indicator would provide best accuracy...."

Best accuracy for what???  You're only interested that the valve being measured is closed... and this is indicated by the corresponding valve being "more or less" open.  How open, as long as its "mostly" is totally irrelevant....  Rosebud is only asking about "how open" due to misunderstanding about how the system works..

".....For anything but a full-race engine where you are setting the tappet gaps individually to chase every tenth of a horsepower, this is more than adequate...."

And it seems its important to point out that while Alex talks about individual gaps being relevant on a race engine, he's talking about the size of the gap......not how its measured...

Cheers, Ian 

 Posted: Jan 8, 2017 10:48AM
Total posts: 9542
Last post: Apr 18, 2024
Member since:Aug 14, 2002
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by h_lankford
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex

I tend to put the car in gear and roll it forward from the passenger side by rotating the front wheel while watching across the valves for movement. 

Not bothering to jack it up, I pushed my car across the driveway in 4th gear, stopping every foot (or less) to adjust each valve in proper sequence
+1
By 'proper sequence' I observe which valve opens next in sequence and use the rule of 9 to determine which valve to adjust. (uses a lot less driveway!)

.

"Hang on a minute lads....I've got a great idea."

 Posted: Jan 8, 2017 09:54AM
Total posts: 2037
Last post: Mar 29, 2024
Member since:Aug 29, 2001
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex

I tend to put the car in gear and roll it forward from the passenger side by rotating the front wheel while watching across the valves for movement. 

Not bothering to jack it up, I pushed my car across the driveway in 4th gear, stopping every foot (or less) to adjust each valve in proper sequence

 Posted: Jan 8, 2017 08:07AM
Total posts: 233
Last post: Oct 2, 2021
Member since:Jun 4, 2012
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
US
Agreed

 Posted: Jan 8, 2017 07:00AM
Total posts: 10237
Last post: Apr 9, 2024
Member since:Mar 24, 1999
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
GB

For anything but a full-race engine where you are setting the tappet gaps individually to chase every tenth of a horsepower, this is more than adequate.

 

Think about it, even a 320° full race cam has the follower sat on the base circle for over half the time...

 Posted: Jan 8, 2017 06:44AM
Total posts: 233
Last post: Oct 2, 2021
Member since:Jun 4, 2012
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
US
No argument with comments however Rosebud question still is " how to accurately establish fully open valve" Alex infers close is good enough ( I agree) but dial indicator would provide best accuracy.

 Posted: Jan 8, 2017 05:55AM
Total posts: 9241
Last post: Aug 17, 2023
Member since:Jun 5, 2000
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
US
+1 to Alex's comments.  

Doug L.
 Posted: Jan 8, 2017 02:07AM
Total posts: 10237
Last post: Apr 9, 2024
Member since:Mar 24, 1999
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
GB

It's actually a very easy and very effective way of performing the task.  The rule of 9 isn't complicated.

When a valve is fully closed, the cam follower is on the base circle which generates the maximum free play in the valve train - the tappet gap.  A few degrees either side of this isn't going to make any difference as the cam follower is on the base circle for a long time.

To establish when the follower is on the base circle, you observe the other valves to determine when theey are fully open - a much easier thing to do.

With the engine stone cold, wind it round until one of the valves is fully open.  Count which valve it is (you ought to count right to left, but it doesn't really matter as long as you stick to the same side) and subtract that from nine.  If No 6 valve is down (inlet on 3) then you adjust valve number 3 (inlet on No2), if 4 is down you adjust 5, and so on.

It isn't difficult.

I tend to put the car in gear and roll it forward from the passenger side by rotating the front wheel while watching across the valves for movement.  With practice, it can be done start to finish in 10-15 minutes.

 Posted: Jan 8, 2017 12:14AM
Total posts: 1716
Last post: Oct 18, 2020
Member since:Oct 18, 2011
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
The rule of 9 is just an efficient way of running through the process.

While the valve is only fully open for a relatively short time it is fully closed for at least 1/2 the cam rotation (basic geometry will demonstrate this).  And you're setting the gap with the valve closed...

So don't sweat it. If 1 "looks like" its at full lift then 8 is measurable....

Cheers, Ian

 Posted: Jan 7, 2017 10:10PM
 Edited:  Jan 7, 2017 11:03PM
Total posts: 1368
Last post: Jul 20, 2023
Member since:Jul 15, 2008
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 117
WorkBench Posts: 1
US
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsumini
I just do it the practical way which is good for all engines. BMC recipe is specific to those 4 cyl engines with that valve arrangement.
We used the screwdriver method to find TDC on 2 stroke MCs back in the 60's. Worked great. But setting valve lash on a 4 stroke I suspect is another matter. Just wish I could tell with certainty when the cam follower is completely [CORRECTION] on the lobe.

Quote:
I would guess that it is a progression such that turning the engine is minimized. i.e. when #1 valve is set then a slight engine rotation will bring up #3 etc. 

Actually, Haynes' method requires a lot of engine cranking to get through all 8 valves. So, I think there's something else at work here.

 

Michael, Santa Barbara, CA

. . . the sled, not the flower

      Poser MotorSports

 Posted: Jan 7, 2017 09:48PM
Total posts: 233
Last post: Oct 2, 2021
Member since:Jun 4, 2012
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
US
Sorry didn't read Haynes before posting.
I just do it the practical way which is good for all engines. BMC recipe is specific to those 4 cyl engines with that valve arrangement. I would guess that it is a progression such that turning the engine is minimized. i.e. when #1 valve is set then a slight engine rotation will bring up #3 etc etc. The best way i know to show valve is fully open is to put a dial indicator on the rocker arm and set it at max indication. If i were following that i would still just look at the piston and find where it changes direction. Some put a screwdriver on the piston for a better visual of piston changing direction. A few mm either side should not affect gap setting.

 Posted: Jan 7, 2017 09:11PM
 Edited:  Jan 7, 2017 10:59PM
Total posts: 1368
Last post: Jul 20, 2023
Member since:Jul 15, 2008
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 117
WorkBench Posts: 1
US
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsumini
Unless I'm reading wrong…
I'm following Haynes; "adjust valve no. 1 when valve no. 8 is fully open, etc.," so I'm looking for fully [CORRECTION] open valves. Yeah, adjusting a valve w/ the piston @ TDC seems simple enough, but since Haynes recommends this rather complicated procedure (rule of 9's), I figure it must be for good reason. Perhaps the valves aren't fully closed at TDC on the compression stroke due to cam overlap?

 

Michael, Santa Barbara, CA

. . . the sled, not the flower

      Poser MotorSports

 Posted: Jan 7, 2017 08:34PM
 Edited:  Jan 7, 2017 09:15PM
Total posts: 233
Last post: Oct 2, 2021
Member since:Jun 4, 2012
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
US
Unless I'm reading wrong you need to set the valve gap when fully closed not when open. When cylinder is on compression stroke you can see top of piston with spark plug out. set valve to rocker gap to spec .012?. Valve fully open is just a function of cam lift and doesn't get "set".

 Posted: Jan 7, 2017 08:18PM
Total posts: 1368
Last post: Jul 20, 2023
Member since:Jul 15, 2008
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 117
WorkBench Posts: 1
US
Is there an accurate method to determine when a valve is completely open for valve adjustment purposes? I'm currently rocking the car w/ the trans in gear and eyeballing the rocker arm until a given valve appears to be fully open. Turning the engine over by hand doesn't seem to be any better. Seems to me if +/- a couple thousandths of an inch is the difference between a burnt valve and worn pushrods, these methods leave a lot to be desired. Any thoughts?

 

Michael, Santa Barbara, CA

. . . the sled, not the flower

      Poser MotorSports